i live west of Indian Cove neighborhood, on elevated ground abutting JTNP land along the foothills.
From my front yard, i view 3, soon to be 4, black splotches of ground from my higher view. one near copper mountain college, two along Lear Ave. and soon to be the fourth with the E-group solar farm.
I live directly across rte 62 from the ugly electrical sub-station with spiderweb looking grey steel power poles leading in all directions to harvest the power from the solar panels.
the whole substructure is ugly detracting from the normal, scenic view.
standing in my front yard, my view is of 9 Airbnbs versus 3 permanent residents. even one Airbnb that the town allowed to be built strictly as an Airbnb with NO intention of ever having a fulltime resident. making it in effect a commercial enterprise rather than a residential one although built on a residential zoned plot.
the powers that be in 29 palms have rezoned, given away hundreds of acres of residential zoned land when offered money. the almighty dollar is the goal of the 29 palms government. at the expense of full time residents in the area. I feel all land west of Stators market is up for grabs as long as the councils are tempted by money.
we receive NO services from the city for our tax dollars, basically TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION !
When residents are allowed COMMENTS opposing solar, Flock cameras, etc saying NO, NO, NO to items, they are disregarded while the commisioners say YES, YES, YES in opposititon.
When does a green energy project lose its purpose?
This question arises when decisions are made solely on the basis of site proximity to existing infrastructure-rather than considering compatibility with the city’s planning goals or the values of its residents.
The chosen site for our next solar farm is a site of historical significance in 29 Palms; THE LARGEST SAND DUNE IN THE AREA, fondly referred to as the “sugar bowl” because of the way that sugar and sand can be blown about in a similar way.
Many locals treasure this landmark using it for walking, horseback riding and motorcycling. The panoramic view of the mountains from the top of the dune is spectacular.
Construction on the fine powdery sand dune produces excessive dust, requiring enormous amounts of water to control the dust. After project is complete, the area will require constant watering to keep the disturbed sand from blowing eastward into nearby homes.
Is this still a green energy project?
The expensive and relatively short lived solar equipment that will be constantly exposed to wind and sand will need constant maintenance to keep solar panels clear.
Is this a green energy project?
Construction activities will threaten endangered species and will require costly monitoring to keep creatures out of harms way.
Is this still a green energy project?
Looking to the future, those driving into the city on HWY 62 will no longer be greeted by this much loved landmark, with its picturesque views and charming name.
Instead, they will see a scarred landscape altered by machinery and political interests, suggesting a city that has prioritized financial gain over its heritage and natural beauty.
Does the decision to build this project in the regions largest sand dune truly align with the city’s “energy conscious” values and still qualify as a green energy project?
i live west of Indian Cove neighborhood, on elevated ground abutting JTNP land along the foothills.
From my front yard, i view 3, soon to be 4, black splotches of ground from my higher view. one near copper mountain college, two along Lear Ave. and soon to be the fourth with the E-group solar farm.
I live directly across rte 62 from the ugly electrical sub-station with spiderweb looking grey steel power poles leading in all directions to harvest the power from the solar panels.
the whole substructure is ugly detracting from the normal, scenic view.
standing in my front yard, my view is of 9 Airbnbs versus 3 permanent residents. even one Airbnb that the town allowed to be built strictly as an Airbnb with NO intention of ever having a fulltime resident. making it in effect a commercial enterprise rather than a residential one although built on a residential zoned plot.
the powers that be in 29 palms have rezoned, given away hundreds of acres of residential zoned land when offered money. the almighty dollar is the goal of the 29 palms government. at the expense of full time residents in the area. I feel all land west of Stators market is up for grabs as long as the councils are tempted by money.
we receive NO services from the city for our tax dollars, basically TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION !
When residents are allowed COMMENTS opposing solar, Flock cameras, etc saying NO, NO, NO to items, they are disregarded while the commisioners say YES, YES, YES in opposititon.
I loved seeing Ash’s comment. Just to add to it;
When does a green energy project lose its purpose?
This question arises when decisions are made solely on the basis of site proximity to existing infrastructure-rather than considering compatibility with the city’s planning goals or the values of its residents.
The chosen site for our next solar farm is a site of historical significance in 29 Palms; THE LARGEST SAND DUNE IN THE AREA, fondly referred to as the “sugar bowl” because of the way that sugar and sand can be blown about in a similar way.
Many locals treasure this landmark using it for walking, horseback riding and motorcycling. The panoramic view of the mountains from the top of the dune is spectacular.
Construction on the fine powdery sand dune produces excessive dust, requiring enormous amounts of water to control the dust. After project is complete, the area will require constant watering to keep the disturbed sand from blowing eastward into nearby homes.
Is this still a green energy project?
The expensive and relatively short lived solar equipment that will be constantly exposed to wind and sand will need constant maintenance to keep solar panels clear.
Is this a green energy project?
Construction activities will threaten endangered species and will require costly monitoring to keep creatures out of harms way.
Is this still a green energy project?
Looking to the future, those driving into the city on HWY 62 will no longer be greeted by this much loved landmark, with its picturesque views and charming name.
Instead, they will see a scarred landscape altered by machinery and political interests, suggesting a city that has prioritized financial gain over its heritage and natural beauty.
Does the decision to build this project in the regions largest sand dune truly align with the city’s “energy conscious” values and still qualify as a green energy project?
With love and respect for our desert,
Cynthia Stoddard