Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Abbitt's avatar

Putting a smog certification use on a prominent intersection would be a big step backwards for the repositioning of 29 for tourism. Similar to putting a storage facility in the heart of the downtown area, which reduced foot traffic in a top prime location. I won't even mention the stupidity of allowing a new liquor store there, as well. Oops, I just did.

Expand full comment
Roger Smith's avatar

There's money to be made, folks. This tourist housing will be a lure the city will not fight. It's about growth and all it brings.

Today I had a revelation on Adobe; I had to cup my ears to talk with a man who rode to town on an unusual bicycle about said bicycle. We were partially successful though mostly between breaks in traffic flow. I have never experienced this out here. That this situation existed was due to what appears to be an overall increase in speed on Adobe and likely a slight uptick in base originated traffic soon to be greatly increased when the clock said quitting time.

I felt old. Now old and quiet 29 will exist mostly in photos. The new one envisioned by city hall and :investors will be simply another visual niche in the carpet of architectural mediocrity spreading across California in pursuit of profits.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?